Let's Talk: Is Real Raw?
I suppose the short answer is clearly "yes." I mean, a raw zucchini is real food, no doubt about it. Right?
Of course, the reverse gets more complicated. Is raw real? (Stick with me here.) After all, "real" has many meanings, many shadings. Would you consider a raw, genetically-modified, pesticide-sprayed zucchini real food? Now THAT's a big question.
But let's table it for now and just say, for the sake of argument, that all zucchinis are the same. One is as good as another. No questions asked.
Is real food by definition raw food?
Or put another way--and I suspect the way we often mean the question--is raw food somehow "realer" than other food?
To be sure, the raw food movement has been around for a while. I thought it would be a flash-fire in the U. S. skillet (as it were) in about 2002, a sort of eat-it-raw answer to that Y2K nonsense and then the 9/11 horror. You know: assuage our fears by eating asparagus raw.
I jest--but not much. I do think something like that was going on--a back-to-basics things. But today, the movement shows little signs of abating. There continue to be raw-food gurus, newly minted; raw food restaurants aplenty in big cities; and even raw-food cookbooks, more planned in the years ahead
Bruce and I were in Vancouver a few weeks ago and the waiter at one restaurant pointed out several dishes on the menu that were "raw"--as if this designation were a huge plus. And perhaps it was. She certainly thought so.
As Bruce and I wrote our new, seven-step plan to get off processed food, REAL FOOD HAS CURVES, available here, we struggled with this raw/real question. Repeatedly. And often. So much so that we insisted the cover have things like wine and cheese and bread on it--lest someone mistake ours for a raw-food plan.
And yet. . . .
In the book, we divide our choices into four categories: real food, almost real food, barely real food, and not real food. We offer explanations of each--as well as ways to figure out how to make sense of the categories. We made these four categories because the world is not simply "real" vs. "not real." And also to give some give to the whole plan: a little grace and forgiveness.
But watch this progression, one of many in the book:
- Real food--a ripe tomato
- Almost real food--natural, salt-free canned tomatoes or sun-dried tomatoes
- Barely real food--preflavored, salted, stewed, canned tomatoes or sun-dried tomatoes packed in oil with flavorings added
- Not real food--condensed tomato soup and most bottled ketchup
We're back to that crucial question, aren't we?
Yesterday, while I was being interviewed on a Martha Stewart radio program, the host sort of chastised me for thinking canned beans were real food. "I'd would have thought you were a dried beans kind of guy," she said.
Well, I am. Except I think canned beans can be real food, too. Or maybe "almost real food." They're certainly not raw food. But they're certainly within the realm of the "real," right? Or not?
So I ask you: is raw food real food? Or stated more clearly: is real food only raw? And raw food the only real food? And if so, is everything else some sort of falling off from that high, crunchy point?





















12 Comments